<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I'm with Norbert.<br>
<br>
I read 20 Icann related mail in like 20 minutes. Could have marked
the whole thread read in one click if I would have prefered. BTW,
the NCSG nirvana the way I see it would be something like 150
message per subject thread (1 each or whatever). So I certainly
can't fathom <br>
<br>
The list is not an announce list. This is, ideally, a policy-making
forum. ICANN has lots of RSS feeds where one can subscribe for an
announce type of service. Perhaps NCSG could have one too, for this
purpose. <br>
<br>
But there is no "cleaning" of this list that will not come with a
participation loss. There is a limit to how democracy will keep your
listserv neat, unfortunately. <br>
<br>
Internal NCUC is another mater. I might be for such a list. <br>
<br>
Nicolas<br>
<br>
On 22/11/2011 10:56 AM, nhklein wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4ECBC61F.5070407@gmx.net" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hi All,<br>
<br>
sorry, I have been involved in ICANN since 1999, but some of the
recent discussions on this list seem to say that I am no longer in
this world. My difficulties to follow these discussions relate to
the fact that these different lists were a place "where we met"
and discussed common concerns, in spite of the fact that we are
spread around the globe (with some obvious "cultural" regions more
dominant than others. <br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:873D956B-7510-4DCC-8F19-9827E9849F56@acm.org"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I think you are missing Judy's point. She is saying <big><b><big>she wishes to stay involved and informed, without the debates.</big></b></big> A well curated announce list is the only solution. Working in harmony with the confluence as a reference.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
This idea cuts me completely off from our common history of many
years - <b>to be involved and informed without the debates???</b>
<br>
<br>
<b>To be involved did mean to participate in the debates</b> (and
even if it meant to share some observation or thoughts only very
occasionally).<br>
<br>
And <b>how to be informed without observing the continuously
on-going debates among us, the "bottom-up membership"?</b> I
think this was never possible in the past.<br>
<br>
But there is obviously a climate change happening (not only in the
physical atmosphere) by a new use of limited resources. And there
is quite some concern that the climate change may have quite
destructive effects, if it does not get under considerate control.
<br>
<br>
<br>
Norbert Klein<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
A while ago, I started a new blog:
...thinking it over... after 21 years in Cambodia
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.thinking21.org/">http://www.thinking21.org/</a>
continuing to share reports and comments from Cambodia.
Norbert Klein
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:nhklein@gmx.net">nhklein@gmx.net</a>
Phnom Penh / Cambodia
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>