<div dir="ltr">Hello,<div><br></div><div>till now it is just a proposal benefiting the hype of domain seizure. we should be more interested if there is at least proof-of-concept or beta version not just statement and making PR in twitter and different blog where there is no really any indication about the technology. I am cautious after example like Haystack supposed to be THE secure circumvention tool.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Rafik<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/12/1 Marc Perkel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marc@churchofreality.org">marc@churchofreality.org</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
I have to agree. I think that the technology to develop a name
server system that no one government can control is worthwhile even
if it is never deployed. We should at least know how to do it and
have that be out there so that if the powers that exist now keep
crossing lines that shouldn't be crossed then the people can switch
them offf rather than them switching us off.<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 12/1/2010 4:53 AM, Nuno Garcia wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">I would joint this endeavour without second
thoughts...<br>
<br>
<div>I am not an anarchist (on the contrary), but it has become
increasingly clear that the entities that rule current Internet
namespace are more part of the problem than part of the
solution...</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>And besides, there is space to create an alternative DNS root
server infrastructure (maybe a superset of this). I haven't
given this much thought, though...</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
On 1 December 2010 11:28, Alex Gakuru <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gakuru@gmail.com" target="_blank">gakuru@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">
Former Pirate Bay's Peter Sunde attempting to create p2p
alternative<br>
to ICANN: <a href="http://www.geek.com/articles/news/peter-sunde-attempting-to-create-p2p-alternative-to-icann-20101129/" target="_blank">http://www.geek.com/articles/news/peter-sunde-attempting-to-create-p2p-alternative-to-icann-20101129/</a><br>
<div>
<div><br>
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:47 PM, DeeDee Halleck <<a href="mailto:deedeehalleck@gmail.com" target="_blank">deedeehalleck@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://readersupportednews.org/off-site-opinion-section/71-71/4099-sinking-the-online-pirates" target="_blank">http://readersupportednews.org/off-site-opinion-section/71-71/4099-sinking-the-online-pirates</a><br>
> -DeeDee<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.deepdishwavesofchange.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://www.deepdishwavesofchange.blogspot.com</a><br>
> <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF&msa=0&msid=109520517858965396132.00048838d78b7d003adb8" target="_blank">http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF&msa=0&msid=109520517858965396132.00048838d78b7d003adb8</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>