I just videotaped a  Copyright Society of the USA discussion on Viacom vs Google.<div><a href="http://www.isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=1487">http://www.isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=1487</a></div><div>The Tiffany case was cited more than once</div>

<div><br></div><div>Cliff Sloan of Skadden Arps went so far as to suggest that whenever there is a pattern of infringement RICO should be invoked...</div><div><br></div><div>j<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Alex Gakuru <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gakuru@gmail.com">gakuru@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="h5"><span style="font-family:Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif;font-size:12px;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);line-height:18px"><p style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:15px;padding-left:0px;border-top-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-style:initial;border-color:initial;outline-width:0px;outline-style:initial;outline-color:initial;font-size:14px;vertical-align:baseline;background-color:transparent;line-height:1.5em;background-repeat:initial initial">


<span style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:arial;line-height:normal;font-size:small">On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Jorge Amodio <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jmamodio@gmail.com" target="_blank">jmamodio@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:</span></p>


</span></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div class="h5"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">More info but still no link to Court order ...<br>


<div><br>
<a href="http://rulingclass.wordpress.com/2010/11/28/the-background-dope-on-dhs-recent-seizure-of-domains/" target="_blank">http://rulingclass.wordpress.com/2010/11/28/the-background-dope-on-dhs-recent-seizure-of-domains/</a><br>



<br>
</div>Regards<br>
<font color="#888888">Jorge<br></font></blockquote><div> </div></div></div><div>Lucky eBay!! - theirs is accorded all due process. This a demonstration of future of legal double standards and/or transparent due process?</div>

<div>- - - - </div>
<div><span style="font-family:Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif;font-size:14px;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);line-height:21px"><strong style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;border-top-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-style:initial;border-color:initial;outline-width:0px;outline-style:initial;outline-color:initial;font-size:14px;vertical-align:baseline;background-color:transparent">Title: </strong><em style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;border-top-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-style:initial;border-color:initial;outline-width:0px;outline-style:initial;outline-color:initial;font-size:14px;vertical-align:baseline;background-color:transparent">Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay</em></span></div>


</div><p style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:15px;padding-left:0px;border-top-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-style:initial;border-color:initial;outline-width:0px;outline-style:initial;outline-color:initial;font-size:14px;vertical-align:baseline;background-color:transparent;line-height:1.5em;font-family:Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif;color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">


<strong style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;border-top-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-style:initial;border-color:initial;outline-width:0px;outline-style:initial;outline-color:initial;font-size:14px;vertical-align:baseline;background-color:transparent">Docket: </strong><a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-300.htm" style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;border-top-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-style:initial;border-color:initial;outline-width:0px;outline-style:initial;outline-color:initial;font-size:14px;vertical-align:baseline;background-color:transparent;color:rgb(0, 101, 135);text-decoration:underline" target="_blank">10-300</a><br>


<strong style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:0px;padding-left:0px;border-top-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-style:initial;border-color:initial;outline-width:0px;outline-style:initial;outline-color:initial;font-size:14px;vertical-align:baseline;background-color:transparent">Issue(s): </strong>Whether, under the doctrine of contributory trademark infringement, a defendant can be held liable for operating a marketplace that it knows is used to sell substantial quantities of goods that infringe a plaintiff's trademark, even if it does not know that particular goods are infringing.</p>


<p style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0px;padding-top:0px;padding-right:0px;padding-bottom:15px;padding-left:0px;border-top-width:0px;border-right-width:0px;border-bottom-width:0px;border-left-width:0px;border-style:initial;border-color:initial;outline-width:0px;outline-style:initial;outline-color:initial;font-size:14px;vertical-align:baseline;background-color:transparent;line-height:1.5em;font-family:Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif;color:rgb(51, 51, 51)">


<span style="color:rgb(0, 0, 0);font-family:arial;line-height:normal;font-size:small"><a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/11/petitions-to-watch-conference-of-11-23-10/" target="_blank">http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/11/petitions-to-watch-conference-of-11-23-10/</a></span></p>


</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>---------------------------------------------------------------<br>Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast<br>WWWhatsup NYC - <a href="http://wwwhatsup.com">http://wwwhatsup.com</a><br>

 <a href="http://pinstand.com">http://pinstand.com</a> - <a href="http://punkcast.com">http://punkcast.com</a><br>  Secretary - ISOC-NY - <a href="http://isoc-ny.org">http://isoc-ny.org</a><br>---------------------------------------------------------------<br>


</div>