<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Hi,<div><br></div><div><div><div>On Jul 16, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Avri Doria wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>i would say, apply.<br><br>the application can go in legally, no matter what Chuck says, and we can consider any application that went in legally.<br><br>a.<br><br>On 16 Jul 2010, at 09:42, Wire James wrote:<br><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#006312"><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#144FAE"><br></font></font><blockquote type="cite">Do I still have time to apply in that case or the deadline of 15th has passed for the GNSO applicants?<br></blockquote></div></blockquote><br></div><div>I agree with Avri and just wrote to Council saying Chuck's proposal doesn't work. CSG is also quite unhappy with it. I don't see how it can stand if at least half the Council's saying no.</div><div><br></div><div>This wouldn't be happening in the first place if our housemates were able to sort out their endorsements in less than 21 days (from currently just six GNSO candidates for the WHOIS group and five for SSR…) Chuck was trying to recalibrate the GNSO's time line to accommodate theirs.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div>Bill</div><br></div></body></html>