<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7654.12">
<TITLE>Re: Sinclair comments - Members review of Draft Proposed NCSG Charter</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>Hi Avri<br/><br/>I am happy to go with consensus - my only purpose was to provide you with some input based on my views<br/><br/>The highlighting was just to point to the specific words that caused me to comment<br/><br/>My point on Constituencies is an administrative one - and if Board is happy for NCSG to have only Interest Groups then I suggest we ask the Board to commit to resourcing Interest Groups eg the discussion on face to face mtgs of some months ago<br/><br/>I'm happy to provide more info on any point that might be unclear<br/><br/>Cheers<br/><br/>Rosemary<p>Sent from my BlackBerry® from Optus</p><hr/><div><b>From: </b> "Avri Doria" <avri@LTU.SE>
</div><div><b>Date: </b>Mon, 3 May 2010 13:45:52 +1000</div><div><b>To: </b><NCUC-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU></div><div><b>Subject: </b>Re: Sinclair comments - Members review of Draft Proposed NCSG Charter</div><div><br/></div>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Hi,<BR>
<BR>
I have read through your extensive edits and on first reading, I have a question and a comment:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
- the question: I do not understand why you have highlighted section in yellow. do you mean that the charter should have these things highlighted.<BR>
<BR>
- On the question of constituencies.<BR>
<BR>
The board has already approved two Stakeholder Groups charters that do not have constituencies. As I understood our conversations with the SIC and the Board they are not requiring constituencies so long as we have a clear charter and we explain the decisions we have made. This is the purpose of the cover letter which is still being worked.<BR>
<BR>
Yours is the first call I have seen from within the NCSG for us to continue with formal constituencies and I do not know if there is any other support for it with the NCSG membership.<BR>
<BR>
At this point unless I see strong support from the members, I do not think it is something we should change.<BR>
<BR>
I will look through the rest of your proposed edits in detail.<BR>
<BR>
a.<BR>
<BR>
On 2 May 2010, at 22:31, Rosemary Sinclair wrote:<BR>
<BR>
> Hi Avri and everyone<BR>
><BR>
> Some thoughts for discussion<BR>
><BR>
> Cheers<BR>
><BR>
> Rosemary<BR>
><BR>
> Rosemary Sinclair<BR>
> Managing Director, ATUG<BR>
> Chairman, INTUG<BR>
> T: +61 2 94958901 F: +61 2 94193889<BR>
> M: +61 413734490<BR>
> Email: rosemary.sinclair@atug.org.au<BR>
> Skype: rasinclair<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>