<HTML xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:v = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m = "http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18904">
<STYLE>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Comic Sans MS";
panose-1:3 15 7 2 3 3 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Segoe UI";
panose-1:2 11 5 2 4 2 4 2 2 3;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Comic Sans MS";
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Comic Sans MS";
color:#1F497D;}
span.PlainTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Plain Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text";
font-family:"Comic Sans MS";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Tahoma" lang=EN-GB link=blue vLink=purple>
<DIV>Hi and sorry for chiming in late. Thanks to Konstantinos for providing a very thorough set of comments; here are just a few minor observations:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>- on p. 2 there is a sentence in bold that says "The very fact that the registrant has responded automatically demonstrates good faith". I think this is putting it too strongly - would it be better to say that the fact a registrant responds can be an indicator of good faith?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>- still on p. 2, I think the community may understand Default somewhat differently, i.e. not as meaning only "failure to respond in a timely manner", but more broadly as including failure to conform to requirements. Can we not just say that it would be unfair to bump the dispute to Default status simply for filing errors and omissions? Additionally, I would suggest removing the phrase "which in any case are part of human nature" as I don't think it necessarily strengthens the point already made.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>- still on p.2, in the following paragraph, when discussing the STI's decision not to accept an expansive interpretation of "default", I suggest that a more appropriate term than "wilfully dismissed" might be "consciously rejected".</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>- on p. 3 I actually don't agree with the use of the phrase "safe harbors" as it does not seem to me to accurately describe the circumstances being considered. As such, I'm not sure I agree that using the word "defense" instead is necessarily "weaker", and in the context of this particular page of our comments seems to imply that by using the words "safe harbor" rather than defense will therefore imply a "binding legal obligation" on the Examiner. May I suggest saying, instead, something along the lines of the need to ensure that a respondent's right to demonstrate the registration is legitimate and in good faith? (I can't recall the Nominet wording but I don't believe they actually use the phrase "safe harbors" either.)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>- on p. 5, instead of "trademark heavens" do we mean "trademark havens"? (BTW, as some of you know, I am uncomfortable with distinguishing between countries that conduct substantive review and those that don't, but can accept that I am in a minority of one on this). </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>- finally, and more substantively, can we add something (on p.3 when discussing Abuse of Process) to urge the staff to develop, in consultation with the community, clearer guidelines as to what is meant by "deliberate material falsehood"?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Sorry I haven't had the bandwidth to do a more thorough job in contributing to the comments, but I hope these observations help.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Best,</DIV>
<DIV>Mary</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT color=#800080>Mary W S Wong</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV>Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs</DIV>
<DIV>Franklin Pierce Law Center</DIV>
<DIV>Two White Street</DIV>
<DIV>Concord, NH 03301</DIV>
<DIV>USA</DIV>
<DIV>Email: <A href="mailto:mwong@piercelaw.edu">mwong@piercelaw.edu</A></DIV>
<DIV>Phone: 1-603-513-5143</DIV>
<DIV>Webpage: <A href="http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php">http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php</A></DIV>
<DIV>Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: <A href="http://ssrn.com/author=437584">http://ssrn.com/author=437584</A></DIV><BR><BR>>>> </DIV>
<TABLE style="MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 15px; FONT-SIZE: 1em" border=0 bgColor=#f3f3f3>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD>
<DIV style="BORDER-LEFT: #050505 1px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 7px">
<TABLE style="FONT: 8pt Tahoma" bgColor=#f3f3f3>
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD><STRONG>From: </STRONG></TD>
<TD>Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis@STRATH.AC.UK></TD></TR>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD><STRONG>To:</STRONG></TD>
<TD><NCUC-DISCUSS@listserv.syr.edu></TD></TR>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD><STRONG>Date: </STRONG></TD>
<TD>3/30/2010 4:45 AM</TD></TR>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD><STRONG>Subject: </STRONG></TD>
<TD>NCUC-STI comments</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<DIV class=Section1>
<P class=MsoPlainText>Dear all,<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>- apologies for the long email - <o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>The time is upon us to submit our comments on the revised versions of the<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>ICANN staff on the recommendations submitted by the Special Trademark Team<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>(STI) in January 2010. I know that I should have submitted this to you earlier on, but may I remind everyone that the deadline is April 1, 2020 for the submission of comments. I would appreciate if you could return your comments/suggestions to me by tomorrow at the very latest.<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>Here is a brief reminder of the whole process. <o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>After the rejection of the Implementation Recommendation Team (IRT)<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>proposals during the public comment period, ICANN produced two documents -<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>one of the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMC) and the other on the Uniform Rapid<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>Suspension (URS) system and asked the GNSO to form a team to review these<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>documents. The GNSO created the STI, which comprised of representatives from<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>all its constituencies. NCUC was represented in this team by Robin, Kathy,<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>Wendy and myself, with Mary being the alternate member.<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>The STI was tasked to either accept the Staff's proposals or reach consensus<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>on a new set of proposals. After a month of extensive meetings and debate, we managed to<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>produce two documents - one on the TMC and the other on the URS - which in<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>their majority received the consensus of the STI (most of the particular<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>issues of both proposals received unanimous consensus, whilst some specific<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>issues received majority consensus). The final STI report can be found here:<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>gnso.icann.org/issues/sti/sti-wt-recommendations-11dec09-en.pdf<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>After the STI submitted its report and was endorsed by the GNSO, a public<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>comment period was initiated -<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>http://forum.icann.org/lists/sti-report-2009/. In the meantime, in its<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>Nairobi meeting, the ICANN Board endorsed the STI's recommendations:<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-12mar10-en.htm.<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>Taking into account the public comments, the ICANN staff produced - what<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>they called - a revised document on both proposals, seeking to take into<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>consideration the STI recommendations as well as the comments received<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>during the public comments period. These new revised proposals can be found<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>at: for the TMC ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#tmc) and for the<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>URS ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#urs) and they are now open for<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>a public comments period. The deadline for submission of the comments is<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>April 1, 2010.<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>Generally speaking the revised proposal takes into consideration most of the<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>issues that the STI recommended. However, there are some specific issues, in<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>which the new recommendations are worst and additions have been made which<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>are arbitrary and - at some instances - even illegitimate.<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>I am attaching our comments for both the URS and the TMC. <o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>Best<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoPlainText>KK<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><o:p> </o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">Law Lecturer,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">University of Strathclyde,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">The Law School,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">The Lord Hope Building,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">141 St. James Road,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">Glasgow, G4 0LT<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">UK<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765</SPAN><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">Selected publications: http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038<o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Comic Sans MS'; COLOR: #1f497d; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">Website: http://domainnamelaw.ning.com/</SPAN><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d"><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="COLOR: #1f497d"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P></DIV></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></BODY></HTML>