<html dir="ltr"><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="MSHTML 8.00.7600.16490">
<style title="owaParaStyle"><!--P {
MARGIN-TOP: 0px; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px
}
--></style>
<meta name="SKYPE_FRAMEID" content="VFPEUAGBSX">
<meta id="skype_v3_tb_marker_id" name="SKYPE_PARSING_HAS_FINISHED" content="metacontent">
</head>
<body style="FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma,sans-serif; FONT-SIZE: 13px" ocsi="x">
<div dir="ltr"><font color="#000000" size="2" face="Tahoma">
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr"><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><b>From:</b> Non-Commercial User Constituency [NCUC-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Rosemary Sinclair
</font></div>
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr"><font size="2"></font>><br>
>Until things change....they stay as they are....<br>
><br>
</div>
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr">Ah but that's exactly the problem, Rosemary. What exactly is allowed now by things "as they are?"
</div>
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr"> </div>
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr">Registrars and staff are claiming (with quite a few facts to support their case) that JM/CO is allowed now by "the way things are" and DAGv3 is "implementation."</div>
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr"> </div>
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr">Registries are claiming that DAGv3 is a policy change and is not part of the "way things are."
</div>
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr"> </div>
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr">So your position that we only need a single, gigantic PDP to resolve all issues related to VI basically means that it would take 3-4 years to answer this question, right? And what happens to the TLD cartel in the meantime? Is it
leeft in place? </div>
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr"> </div>
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr">--MM</font></div>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><font size="2"></font> </div>
<div style="DIRECTION: ltr"> </div>
</body>
</html>