<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Dear Bill, All<div><br></div><div>I have little time but I could work with Cedric on this letter if you agree. But I am open to hear other strategics. Then, we could go to the ombudsman. Happy to work on it, too.</div><div>Katitza</div><div><br><div><div>On Aug 9, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Katitza Rodriguez wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Dear Bill:</div><div><br></div><div><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><br></font></div><div>Interesting parallel: I asked Rob in a GNSO council meeting, and reiterated in my submission to the public comment period, that statements made in support of the NCUC version by NCUC members and hundreds (counting the Internet Governance Caucus etc) of external supporters in the public comment period ending 15 April be taken into account in the summary of the PC ending 23 July. The reasons for doing so were straightforward: there was no reason to believe that the organizations and individuals that said they supported the NCUC model and therefore rejected the opposite model had changed their positions, so they should not be required to all mobilize and restate their stances a couple months later, in the summer travel season (although some did). The suggestion was not acted upon or even mentioned in the staff summary.</div></div></blockquote></div><br><div><br></div><div>We need to write a letter to the Chairman of the Board and all the Board Members explaining:</div><div><br></div><div>a. NCUC proposal & the support it got (signatures orgs + individuals + coalitions).</div><div>b. Explain why we consider there were not a bottom up approach (and how we get ignore it).</div><div>c. Would be nice to analyzed the ICANN's last proposal and attached comments to it. </div><div><br></div><div>We do not need to ask for more signatures. We need to attached those signatures we already collect and enforce what we already request. I am pretty sure that many board members are not aware of our NCUC process to get consensus on documents. how the NCUC proposal were discussed in different mailing lists, nor how NGOs get their consensus through their own organizations structures/memberships/coalitions, etc. </div><div><br></div><div>My two cents. Unfortunately, I am not able to help right now as I am very busy. But Cedric Laurant has volunteer to write the letter if NCUC Steering Committee agree on this. </div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div><div>Katitza</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>