<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
Dear All,<div><br></div><div>Just a quick note to underscore Kathy's call to arms -- and to ask each NCUC member to please send in a comment to ICANN <span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline;">today</span> regarding the IRT Report and our concerns for its impact on free expression, fair use, and competition. IRT Report expands trademark rights over domain names in ways trademark law has never allowed. Don't let the IP lobbyists make new global trademark law in secret via ICANN. If the public does not speak up on this issue, the IP lobbyists will steam-roll over our rights to use ordinary words in domain names or to criticize companies or brands in domain names.</div><div><br></div><div>Deadline is today end-of-business in California (end of the global day - there is still time to get your thoughts on the record). You can send in just a brief paragraph stating your personal view on the IRT Report.</div><div><br></div><div>Please send comments to ICANN's IRT written comment email address: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:irt-final-report@icann.org">irt-final-report@icann.org</a></div><div><br></div><div>Thank you,</div><div>Robin</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><div>On Jul 4, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"> Hi Baudouin,<br> At long last, I am so pleased to share with you a French translation of the Joint Statement on the IRT Report by ALAC and the NCUC -- translated by Patrick Vende Walle of ALAC, one of the statement's co-writers along with me. Thank you for sharing it with different platforms and networks in the DR Congo and Central Africa. <br> <br> Please consider submitting comments in French to the IRT written comment email address -- <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:irt-final-report@icann.org">irt-final-report@icann.org</a><br> The deadline is this Monday, and even short comments in support of the NCUC/ALAC Joint Statement and its principles will make a difference!<br> <br> All, this is a side-by-side English/French translation in case you would like to see the Joint Statement again. Robin and Cheryl had the entire room's full attention when they presented it!<br> Best,<br> Kathy<br> <blockquote cite="mid:ecb172de0906250155u6eea5c3eo673e6c7e022fb5a1@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <div>Kathy,</div> <div> </div> <div>thanks to share this draft. It's very important and I wish if possible to have a french version allowing me to share it among different plat form and network in DR Congo and Central Africa by national and sub regional mailing list. </div> <div>I tried to do a substantial translation but I have fear to go out understanding content.</div> <div>congratulations for this work.</div> <div> </div> <div>Baudouin<br> <br> </div> <div class="gmail_quote">2009/6/23 Kathy Kleiman <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Kathy@kathykleiman.com">Kathy@kathykleiman.com</a>></span><br> <blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;" class="gmail_quote"> <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">Hi All,<br> For discussion purposes a little later in our meeting today, here is a DRAFT Joint Statement on the IRT Report between NCUC and ALAC.<br> It would be very nice if, at the Board Public Forum on Thursday, we could go up together with ALAC to make a strong joint statement.<br> That would make the Board wake up! :-)<br> <br> Best,<br> Kathy<br> (below in text and attached in Word)<br> <br><p style="text-align: center; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt;" align="center"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;">DRAFT</span></p><p style="text-align: center; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt;" align="center"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;">Joint Statement on the DIRT Report</span></p><p style="text-align: center; line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt;" align="center"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;">From ALAC and NCUC </span></p><div style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt; "><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;"> </span><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><div style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt; "><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;"> </span><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><p style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;">The At-Large Community, ALAC and the Non-Commercial Users Constituency of ICANN strongly support the creation of new gTLDs. Having said that, the process to move forward with changes to the DAG Guidebook requires the legitimacy of full community participation and full transparency.</span></p><p style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;">In the case of the IRT Report, we had neither transparency nor openness. The IRT Report and its recommendations harm the interests of domain name Registrants and Internet end users, and consequently we must object to the vast bulk of its recommendations.<br> </span></p><p style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;">To be more specific: </span></p><p style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;">1. The Globally Protected Marks List – the GPML database- is a matter well beyond ICANN's scope and its core competence. It presumes to be able to resolve an issue that even WIPO wrestles with. Clearly the creation of the GPML, if even possible, would cause enormous complexity. Instead of speeding up the process of creating new gTLDs, it would introduce delays that would last for years. But the creation of this list must take place outside of ICANN.</span></p><p style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;">2. The GPML takes no consideration of the actual limits of rights and protections allowed to trademarks. In the real world, trademark owners apply for a trademark in a specific class of goods and services, and their use is bound to that class or classes. By protecting a string of letters in all new gTLDs, the GPML would extend trademarks into new gTLDs far beyond the bounds of their class of goods and services, far beyond existing national laws and internationatreaties. <span> </span><br> </span></p><p style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;">3. We have enormous problems with the Uniform Suspension Service (URS). The URS mechanism subverts conventional UDRP practice as it gives entirely insufficient time for notice to the registrant of the pending dispute. Thus, the registrant is unfairly limited in his/her right of response and the process is missing the fundamental principle of due process.<br> </span></p><p style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;">[ Kathy Note: This paragraph below seems to be somewhat controversial within ALAC. I think we will be dropping it. Don't worry, we'll include the statement in our comments -- if you all agree]<br> 4. ALAC and NCUC strongly object to the Thick Whois Registry. In mandating such, the IRT Committee did not address any of the privacy issues that arise from moving personal data from many countries with data protection laws, perhaps, to a single country without data protection. Does ICANN really want to be in a position in which it may be violating national laws?</span></p> <span style="line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;"></span><br><p style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;">Overall, we wish the result were different. We wish the IRT had delivered a reasonable proposal for the protection of trademarks. But the product delivered is far outside the scope and core competence of ICANN, and outside the bounds of trademark law.</span></p><p style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;">We can do better; we must do better before we move forward.</span></p><p style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;">Consequently, NCUC and ALAC stand before this forum together in fundamental opposition to many of the IRT Results.</span></p><div style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt; "><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;"> </span><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><div style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt; "><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;"> </span><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><p style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt;"><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;">Signed [for sharing a written cop y of a floor statement with the Board]</span></p><div style="line-height: normal; margin-bottom: 0pt; "><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'; font-size: 10pt;"> </span><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><p>ALAC<span> </span>NCUC</p><div> <br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><p>__________________<span> </span>__________________</p><p>__________________<span> </span>__________________</p><div> <br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div> <br> </div> </blockquote> </div> <br> <br clear="all"> <br> -- <br> SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN<br> COORDONNATEUR NATIONAL REPRONTIC<br> COORDONNATEUR SOUS REGIONAL ACSIS/AFRIQUE CENTRALE<br> MEMBRE FACILITATEUR GAID AFRIQUE<br> téléphone fixe: +243 1510 34 91<br> Téléphone mobile:+243998983491/+243999334571<br> <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:email%3Ab.schombe@gmail.com">email:b.schombe@gmail.com</a><br> <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://akimambo.unblog.fr">http://akimambo.unblog.fr</a><br> <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://educticafrique.ning.com/">http://educticafrique.ning.com/</a><br> </blockquote> <br> </blockquote></div><br><div> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0; "><div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><div><br class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><div>IP JUSTICE</div><div>Robin Gross, Executive Director</div><div>1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA</div><div>p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451</div><div>w: <a href="http://www.ipjustice.org">http://www.ipjustice.org</a> e: <a href="mailto:robin@ipjustice.org">robin@ipjustice.org</a></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></span><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"> </div><br></div></body></html>