[NCUC-DISCUSS] priorities

William Drake william.drake at uzh.ch
Wed May 13 22:13:13 CEST 2015


Hi

Having the UN General Assembly review the WSIS+10 in a purely intergovernmental setting entails some real risks, and nongovernmental stakeholders really need to take what opportunities to weigh in the TBD ‘modalities’ of the preparatory process allow.

This is a really important issue that we have discussed in the public Internet governance sessions at the Los Angeles and Singapore meetings, and we will so do so again in Buenos Aires. We’ve also discussed it a number of times in the CCW on Internet governance, alas thus far without getting consensus on submitting a statement. 

So I’m very happy to see ISOC moving forward and hope this gets individual/organizational member support. If there were also interest in supporting it at the constituency or stakeholder group level I’d think that’d be worth discussing.  

Bill


> On May 13, 2015, at 9:41 PM, konstantinos at komaitis.org wrote:
> 
> Dear all
> 
> The Internet Society has put together a letter calling for an Open WSIS+10 preparatory process. The letter is addressed to the President of the UN General Assembly and it is now online at
> 
> https://www.openwsis2015.org/signatories/ <https://www.openwsis2015.org/signatories/>
> The first round of consultations for WSIS+10 should take place the week of the 8th of June, in New York. We hope that with this letter, the process that will follow will include all relevant stakeholders vs. governments only.
> 
> I hope you consider signing on to the letter.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> KK
> 
>  
>  
> On 2015-05-13 11:48, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> 
>> I see the very same gap, DeeDee. It would be nice if Freedom of Expression and Free Speech groups were represented... 
>> Best,
>> Kathy
>> 
>> On 5/13/2015 11:26 AM, DeeDee Halleck wrote:
>>> watching Congress discuss ICANN
>>> the hearings today make it clear what is the priority list for Congressional concern:
>>> Top of the list: copyright protection
>>> next: security, law enforcement
>>>  
>>> no mention of open access, protection of communication rights, human rights.
>>>  
>>> xx
>>> dd
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> -- 
>>> http://www.deepdishwavesofchange.org <http://www.deepdishwavesofchange.org/>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

*********************************************************
William J. Drake
International Fellow & Lecturer
  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
  University of Zurich, Switzerland
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, 
  ICANN, www.ncuc.org
william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
  www.williamdrake.org
Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap http://goo.gl/sRR01q
*********************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20150513/e16223bc/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list