<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div>Hi,</div><br><div><div>On Feb 23, 2015, at 9:44 AM, Walid AL-SAQAF <<a href="mailto:wsaqaf@gmail.com">wsaqaf@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">[SNIP]<br><br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: TrebuchetMS; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><b>Just so we don't spend too much more time on this, could you do me a favor and point out that the below active list is what we want to include in the survey? Is there anything else missing, incorrect, or needs removal?</b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><div><b><u>GNSO Working Groups:</u></b></div><div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><ol><li><b>Curative Rights Protections for IGO/INGOs (IGO-INGO-CRP)<br></b></li></ol></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote>Active<br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: TrebuchetMS; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div><ol start="2"><li><b>Discussion Group – New gTLD Subsequent Rounds (ngTLDs-DG)<br></b></li></ol></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote>Active<br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: TrebuchetMS; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div><ol start="3"><li><b>GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on Early Engagement (GAC-GNSO-CG)<br></b></li></ol></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote>This is Active, and although its charter was adopted by the GNSO council and the GAC, it isn't a GNSO WG per se. Just a consultation group consisting of some GNSO councillors and GAC members. It isn’t open to participation/membership.<br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: TrebuchetMS; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div><ol start="4"><li><b>Geo Regions Review Community-wide WG<br></b></li></ol></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote>Not sure if this is active, or not. I don’t believe it is. It submitted a draft final report years ago, but I don’t know if this was followed up, or not.<br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: TrebuchetMS; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div><ol start="5"><li><b>GNSO Data & Metrics for Policy Making WG<br></b></li></ol></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote>Active<br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: TrebuchetMS; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div><ol start="6"><li><b>GNSO PDP Improvements Discussion Group (PDP-IMPR)<br></b></li></ol></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote>I’m not aware of this being active. I might have missed it.<br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: TrebuchetMS; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div><ol start="7"><li><b>GNSO Review Committee (REVIEW)<br></b></li></ol></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote>Not sure what this is, but you may mean the GNSO Review Working Party (<br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: TrebuchetMS; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div><ol start="8"><li><b>GNSO Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation (SCI)<br></b></li></ol></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote>Not a GNSO WG, but a standing committee chartered by the GNSO Council.<br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: TrebuchetMS; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div><ol start="9"><li><b>Policy & Implementation WG (POLIMP)<br></b></li></ol></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote>Active<br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: TrebuchetMS; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div><ol start="10"><li><b>RAA Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues WG (PPSAI)<br></b></li></ol></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote>Active<br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="font-family: TrebuchetMS; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div><ol start="11"><li><b><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 17px;">Translation/Transliteration of Internationalized Registration Data WG (T&T)</span></b></li></ol></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote>Active</div><div><br></div><div>I don’t know wether or not you want to point out that numbers 1, 10 and 11 are GNSO PDP working groups, as opposed to 5 and 9 that are GNSO (non-PDP) working groups.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks.</div><div><br></div><div>Amr</div></body></html>