<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 4:52 AM, William Drake <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:william.drake@uzh.ch" target="_blank">william.drake@uzh.ch</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">I prefer Discuss and do not see a non-turf-strategem argument against it</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div style>Actually, I thought Joly's suggestion, which had nothing to do with turf (and could help with reducing the number of lists), was best:</div><div><br></div><div>On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Joly MacFie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:joly@punkcast.com" target="_blank">joly@punkcast.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I vote for members, then it's clear who you are addressing with no restriction as to purpose.</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><div></div></div></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div style>I support that naming convention.</div><div style><br></div><div style>-- B</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
It was NCUC discuss before NPOC was added and consistency in the archive would have its virtue. I am not interested in policing or (dis)couraging people from talking to each other on one list vs the other, do not believe we should preordain a hierarchy or division of labor, but also do not want to spend time fetishizing every small item into a matter of high principle that requires trench warfare. So I will roll with whatever the consensus among elected EC members is.<br>
<br>
But it would be great to do soon!<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
Bill<br>
<div class=""><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On Feb 10, 2013, at 10:10, Tapani Tarvainen <<a href="mailto:ncuc@tapani.tarvainen.info">ncuc@tapani.tarvainen.info</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> All,<br>
><br>
> I believe we've already agreed to create a mailing list for ncuc<br>
> members. I would like to go ahead with it without further delay.<br>
><br>
> There's been some debate about what the list should be called,<br>
> and as far as I can tell calling it simply "ncuc-members" would<br>
> be acceptable to everyone.<br>
><br>
> Opinions, should I go ahead and create it?<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Tapani Tarvainen<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Ec-ncuc mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Ec-ncuc@ipjustice.org">Ec-ncuc@ipjustice.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://mailman.ctyme.com/listinfo/ec-ncuc" target="_blank">http://mailman.ctyme.com/listinfo/ec-ncuc</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ec-ncuc mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ec-ncuc@ipjustice.org">Ec-ncuc@ipjustice.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mailman.ctyme.com/listinfo/ec-ncuc" target="_blank">http://mailman.ctyme.com/listinfo/ec-ncuc</a><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>