I got no reply to this, so I assume we can go ahead with this renaming of the NCSG-NCUC list to the NCSG list. The followup question is then - does NCUC want to initiate a separate list for internal constituency business?<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Brenden Kuerbis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bkuerbis@internetgovernance.org">bkuerbis@internetgovernance.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Unless there are other suggestions, I'm going to start the process of renaming the NCSG-NCUC-Discuss list to the NCSG-Discuss list. <br><br>Does anyone have thoughts about NCUC creating a separate list for its own constituency business?<br>
<br>Thanks,<br><font color="#888888"><br>Brenden</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message ----------<br>From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Avri Doria</b> <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org" target="_blank">avri@acm.org</a>></span><br>
Date: Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:26 PM<br>
Subject: NCSG discussion list<br>To: Brenden Kuerbis <<a href="mailto:bkuerbis@internetgovernance.org" target="_blank">bkuerbis@internetgovernance.org</a>><br><br><br>hi,<br>
<br>
What do we do to create an NCSG discussion list that does not have the NCUC name in it. I would like to keep the same list, but I think we ned to rename it.<br>
<br>
As to whether NCUC wishes to have a seperate NCUC list, that is up to NCUC itself.<br>
<br>
Suggestions?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
a.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></div><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>